How to choose Rugged Fiber Optic (RFO) solutions?

Abstract

This white paper explains in five steps what engineers need to consider during the selection process for a rugged fiber optic connectivity solution.
 

Mark Benton, Engineering & Product Manager TE Connectivity first differentiates between physical contact and expanded beam technology. A second step of consideration is the application’s signal density requirement. Different solutions are available that respond to the need of higher density – especially inside the box for VPX embedded systems. The third step is the choice of the right termini in order to minimize insertion loss (IL) and back reflection. The forth step should be about connector materials, form factors and sizes that best suit the application. In a fifth step the best cable option needs to be chosen. Again, various options are available depending on the application and whether cables are being routed within a box or between boxes or active devices in limited spaces.

 

Mark Benton

KNOW MORE ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Mark specializes in Rugged Fiber Optics Applications, Optoelectronic Transceivers and Media Conversion, Wavelength and Time Domain Multiplexing. His over 4 decades of diverse R&D and Product Development experience in these areas helps him to understand the intricasies about the product & its applications.

OUR FIBER OPTICS PRODUCTS

Rugged Fiber Optics enable data delivery at high speed and over long distance to a level not possible with traditional copper cable in managing 40G and 100G capacity communication protocols with simultaneous EMI immunity (Electromagnetic interference).

How to choose Rugged Fiber Optic (RFO) solutions?

Abstract

This white paper explains in five steps what engineers need to consider during the selection process for a rugged fiber optic connectivity solution.
 

Mark Benton, Engineering & Product Manager TE Connectivity first differentiates between physical contact and expanded beam technology. A second step of consideration is the application’s signal density requirement. Different solutions are available that respond to the need of higher density – especially inside the box for VPX embedded systems. The third step is the choice of the right termini in order to minimize insertion loss (IL) and back reflection. The forth step should be about connector materials, form factors and sizes that best suit the application. In a fifth step the best cable option needs to be chosen. Again, various options are available depending on the application and whether cables are being routed within a box or between boxes or active devices in limited spaces.

 

Mark Benton

KNOW MORE ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Mark specializes in Rugged Fiber Optics Applications, Optoelectronic Transceivers and Media Conversion, Wavelength and Time Domain Multiplexing. His over 4 decades of diverse R&D and Product Development experience in these areas helps him to understand the intricasies about the product & its applications.

OUR FIBER OPTICS PRODUCTS

Rugged Fiber Optics enable data delivery at high speed and over long distance to a level not possible with traditional copper cable in managing 40G and 100G capacity communication protocols with simultaneous EMI immunity (Electromagnetic interference).